You mentioned you documented the oil dilution for warranty purposes. Unfortunately you won’t get any warranty help since you have the K-Tuner. You just voided it.
Firstly, no, that doesn't. The tune would actually fix the fuel dilution by burning more of the wasted fuel.You mentioned you documented the oil dilution for warranty purposes. Unfortunately you won’t get any warranty help since you have the K-Tuner. You just voided it.
Good answer but good luck if something happens.Firstly, no, that doesn't. The tune would actually fix the fuel dilution by burning more of the wasted fuel.
Second, it has to be proven in court that the reason the engine failed is the tune, considering the engine had fuel dilution PRIOR to the tune, its on the OEM, hence the evidence and mileage of purchase.
Thirdly, I can flash it to stock, and fuel dilution will still kill the engine if its bad enough, therefore, it makes no difference.
Magnuson-Moss act makes it so that modifying your car doesn't immediately void your warranty.
And it works with a good lawyer which there are A LOT of great car enthusiast lawyers.
Firstly, I understand why you wouldn't tune, but I would never run 87 on a turbo car, period, ever. Every single person I know who believed that ended up with blown motors. 89 a minimum, 91 recommended. Honda's own tune (according to Hondata) is geared for 100 octane, the rest is ignition pull back, which is risky. The reason they allow 87 octane is to show to the USA DOT and EPA that the car is "efficient" and "affordable", just like telling us to use 0w20 when in EU honda's run highest octane and 5w30. So Please, do your own research, but I wouldn't trust 87 octane on ANY turbo car. I did some testing on the factory tune with the K tuner to get base line k.con readings, and with 87 octane on the stock tune they were at way over 0.75 (you wanna be bellow 0.6) and with 91 octane I was around 0.51 and with 93 around 0.45. With the tune, K.con was around 0.49 on 93 octane and around 0.8 on 89. On the factory tune I logged about 20 cylinder knocks within a 30 minute drive to work, even with the tune and 93 octane I don't get more than 1.imo its not worth tuning my 2.0t, because one of the reasons i got the car was so i could use 87 octane and still have so much more power than your average commuter car. i also dont think a catch can is necessary or it would have come with one from factory. initially i thought tinting your headlight is silly, but tbh people would probably really appreciate dimmer headlights cause these headlights are bright af, and it looks much better than i thought and i might try that out, something i never thought id say. everyone that got the rear sway bar upgrade says the same thing, i really want to get that mod done as well. i figured id do that someday to make the car feel "new" again. nice writeup overall, you put more effort than most people ever would on a forum post lol.
I disagree. As mentioned the turbo ends up pressurizing the crank case, plus this is a direct injection engine. Those oil vapors WILL coke on the intake valves. Probably the intake runners in the head as well. People like to believe Honda is a "good guy" manufacturer and would never leave out something needed for longevity of an engine. But the reality is that they made a business decision. I recommend getting a catch can (1.5T and 2.0T). One of our Hondas is an '04 Accord with a zillion miles that has been in the family since new. It has port injection and sans turbo, so no catch can.i also dont think a catch can is necessary or it would have come with one from factory.
i hope you can understand that if i am to choose between believing a manufacturer with billions poured into R&D, versus a rando on the internet, i will probably side with the manufacturer. if using 87 would damage the engine, they wouldn't recommend it. i understand that there are financial reasons for doing this but i simply don't believe honda would put their reputation on the line if that was the case. its been 5 years of only ever putting 87 and i haven't had a single issue. there are millions of these cars on the road, i am pretty sure they are all not blowing up like you claim. 0w20 is recommended because of the colder climates in NA and it is true that the oil becomes too thin at high operating temperatures to maintain lubrication and will evaporate faster. but this is my daily driver. im not drag racing it every day. i rarely ever go WOT but ill open it up a few times every driving session (and when i do, it does it with no knocking, no nonsense, it just delivers lots of power).Firstly, I understand why you wouldn't tune, but I would never run 87 on a turbo car, period, ever. Every single person I know who believed that ended up with blown motors. 89 a minimum, 91 recommended. Honda's own tune (according to Hondata) is geared for 100 octane, the rest is ignition pull back, which is risky. The reason they allow 87 octane is to show to the USA DOT and EPA that the car is "efficient" and "affordable", just like telling us to use 0w20 when in EU honda's run highest octane and 5w30. So Please, do your own research, but I wouldn't trust 87 octane on ANY turbo car. I did some testing on the factory tune with the K tuner to get base line k.con readings, and with 87 octane on the stock tune they were at way over 0.75 (you wanna be bellow 0.6) and with 91 octane I was around 0.51 and with 93 around 0.45. With the tune, K.con was around 0.49 on 93 octane and around 0.8 on 89. On the factory tune I logged about 20 cylinder knocks within a 30 minute drive to work, even with the tune and 93 octane I don't get more than 1.
Second, the catch can is a must on any turbo car. The reason its not included is because its a 250$+ part AND its a maintenance item. Again, to fit the EPA spec, having more maintenance items = more taxes paid by honda per vehicle. This is another reason why manufacturers moved to 10,000 mile oil changes, LOWER EMISSIONS TAXES. This has nothing to do with "improved" technology. Catch cans have been proven to not only prolong the life of a turbocharger by limiting the amount of oil and gas that gets sucked back into the intake, but also limits the amount of carbon build up on the valves in GDI engines. If you have a non turbo, port injected engine, yes, its pretty much useless. But, to maintain the PCV system better, catch cans are a MUST, PERIOD. Do your own research but the evidence is more than abundant. (Think about it, imagine honda spending an extra 300 million on catch cans in the US alone, PLUS EPA taxes).
Third, as I sad, the headlight tint is ONE WAY, it does not affect the brightness of the headlights. But it is cosmetically visible.
Fourth, Yes, the Rear Sway Bar is by far the single best improvement out of all of these other than the tune. Worth the money. Its a total pain in the ass to install though, I highly recommend you DON'T remove the exhaust to pull out the factory sway bar, it can be done with a rubber mallet and if you try to turn the factory bar linear to the car, it should slide out. To install the new one I recommend you set the car down as low as you can, so the wheels touch the ground. I understand not everyone is as slim as I am but this will make it much easier to line up the sway bar links to the control arms, otherwise, hammer is the way.
Hope this summarizes my logicHappy modding.
Disclaimer, this is based on my own research, and my own opinion, nothing here should be taken at face value without personal inquiry.
I have not either. It seems unlikely the build up will cause an engine failure. The build up will displace space normally available for oxidizer flow, reducing the power potential of the engine. Think of it as "un-porting" the head. Or, the carbon build-up is a version of "restrictor plate racing".i also have yet to hear of any accord that suffered an engine failure due to carbon buildup...