Joined
·
10 Posts
Has anyone made Actual gains in power besides the normal straight from box tuner (hondata ktuner), intake, or exhaust yet? That’s all I really see in here or cosmetic upgrades.
Has anyone made Actual gains in power besides the normal straight from box tuner (hondata ktuner), intake, or exhaust yet? That’s all I really see in here or cosmetic upgrades.
24 lbs. is the boost target now...23 lbs. all day...pretty solid with no issues. It's all about a properly configured boost-by-gear setup.I would love to see a one of these accords murdered out into a Drag Car, with a turbo Sticking out and a side or top straight pipe exit. Honestly wonder how hard they can be pushed on the Automatic 10 speed platform.
What modifications have you don't for this power?
Huh?What modifications have you don't for this power?
"What Modifications have been done to the Car to obtain such Power!"Huh?
Hello,That power is more than likely an upgraded turbo that's still needs some tuning. I have a tremendous amount of experience with VW 2.0t's. Not sure what company Honda uses, but from the pictures of a Civic type R turbo, it's about the size of a K04, and the Dyno plot is very similar to what a turbo of that size would flow. Gt28 or Gt30 comparable turbos of which there are too many to list here( Precision, Borg Warner to name a couple of makers) would be good upgrades depending on how strong the stock internals are. Anything with more low end torque on than what the picture of the Dyno plot shows on VW's require rods. So unless you plan on doing internals, the above plot may be around what your going to get with bolt ons. Again I have no idea as to the strength of the Honda motor, simply relaying my experience with something similar.
Hello,Hwe
Hello,
That is with the stock TD03 and pure gas 93 octane with none of that ethanol junk at all. Thanks guys and have an amazing day!
This is why the torque curve looks like a bigger turbo than stock. Low end torque kills engine internals, especially with such a small turbo having so much torque down low. The tuner has delayed it for reliability.Hello,
She is a full bolt-on girl and was tuned on a properly configured Dynojet at National Speed in Richmond, VA on a conservative tune for reliability.
Could be the ECU adapting too. It's too hard to speculate without seeing more data from logs, ie fueling request vs actual, boost request vs actual, wastegate solenoid duty cycle, timing ect.I always through 1 Gear also , in the Area of Shift By Auto , It's to High for Cams Shifting , but 50Hp & 50 Ft lbs Tq. is Spike for Sure .. with a Raise Awards
Might be Waste Gate Cracks Full Open ~ ? But with Electronic Control seems that would be way Smoother .. ?
Guess it could be ~ Fuel Dump
"Low end torque kills engine internals"This is why the torque curve looks like a bigger turbo than stock. Low end torque kills engine internals, especially with such a small turbo having so much torque down low. The tuner has delayed it for reliability.